Latest This Weekend Weddings
2 Forks Events Event Discovery, Catering & Planning Guides · 2forksevents.com
VOL. I
Saturday, 25 July 2026
Subscribe
Independent · Named Editors · Sourced Content · Real Event Coverage · 2forksevents.com

Menu

MusicWeddingsPartiesCorporateCateringLocalSeasonalIndustry AboutEditorial TeamNewsletterContact

Corrections

Last updated: 25 July 2026

2 Forks Events corrects errors promptly and in the open. This page explains our approach to corrections and updates, the different ways we handle different kinds of changes, how to request a correction, and it serves as our public corrections log. A transparent corrections practice is one of the clearest signals of a publication’s good faith, and it matters especially for event content, where accuracy has real consequences.

Why we log corrections publicly

Everyone makes mistakes; what distinguishes a trustworthy publication is what it does about them. Rather than quietly editing a page and hoping no one noticed, we correct errors openly and, for substantive changes, record what changed. This lets readers see that we take accuracy seriously, and it holds us to the standards in our Editorial Policy.

The kinds of changes we make

How we handle a correction

When an error is identified — by our team or a reader — we check it against authoritative sources, and if confirmed we correct the article as soon as we reasonably can. For substantive corrections, we record that a correction was made. Where an error was significant enough to have misled readers — a wrong event date, for instance — we are candid about it rather than minimising it. Our aim is that the corrected article should be accurate and that the record should reflect that a change was made.

How to request a correction

If you believe something we have published is inaccurate, please tell us. Email corrections@2forksevents.com (or use our contact page) with the URL of the article, the specific point you believe is wrong, and, where possible, the authoritative source — the official event page, the venue, or the ticketing platform — that supports the correction. We review every substantive request and respond. Providing a source helps us verify and act quickly, and we are grateful to the readers who take the time to flag an error.

What we will not do

We will not remove or alter accurate coverage simply because someone dislikes it, and a request to “correct” a report will not succeed unless the report is actually inaccurate. Disagreement with our opinion or recommendation is not the same as an error of fact. Nor will we quietly delete an article to make an inconvenient but accurate fact disappear.

Corrections log

Corrections will be recorded here as they are made, with the date and a short description of what changed, so the record is public and durable. As a newly launched publication, our log currently has no entries. When we make a correction, it will appear here.

No corrections logged yet.

Our commitment

A correction is not a failure of journalism; concealing one is. We are committed to correcting our mistakes openly, to updating our event coverage as details change, and to treating the accuracy of the public record as part of our responsibility to readers.

How quickly we act

How urgently we act on a correction depends on its seriousness. A mistake that could materially mislead readers — a wrong event date, a wrong venue, an incorrect price — is treated as a priority and corrected as soon as we have verified the correct position, because readers may be about to act on it. Less serious errors are fixed in the ordinary course. In every case, our aim is that the version on the site should be accurate, and that significant changes should be visible rather than hidden.

The permanence of the record

We treat the published record as something to be corrected and updated rather than erased. Except where the law requires removal, or there is a compelling reason such as a serious risk of harm, we do not simply delete articles to make accurate information disappear. Correcting an error, adding context, or noting a later development serves readers better than pretending a piece never existed.

Why this matters for an event publication

For a publication people use to plan nights out, trips, and once-in-a-lifetime celebrations, the credibility of the corrections process is inseparable from the credibility of the coverage. Readers need to know that when we learn we were wrong about a date or a detail, we say so and fix it fast. That is why we correct in public and invite readers to hold us to account.

Right of reply

Where our coverage concerns a named person, venue, event, or business and they believe it is inaccurate or unfair, we consider requests for a right of reply on their merits. This may take the form of a correction, a clarification, an added statement of their position, or, where appropriate, a signed response. A right of reply is about fairness and accuracy; it is not a mechanism for removing accurate but unwelcome coverage.

Updating event coverage specifically

Event coverage deserves special mention because it dates faster than most content. When a tour adds or moves dates, a festival changes its line-up, a venue changes, or an event is postponed or cancelled, we update the relevant coverage and its last-updated date rather than leaving a misleading page live. Where an event has passed, we may update the framing so the page remains accurate and useful as a record. Keeping this coverage current is a continuous part of our work, not a one-off.

Contacting us

To report an error, email corrections@2forksevents.com or use our contact page, with the article link, the specific point, and a supporting source where possible — for event details, the official event page or ticketing platform is ideal. We acknowledge substantive reports and tell you the outcome, and we are grateful to the readers who help us keep our coverage accurate.